Back to news

What is the economic justification for implementing VIEWAPP in insurance companies?

The question of economic efficiency is the main one when deciding on the implementation of any new tools in an insurance company. This is especially true when it concerns a process that already exists: inspections are carried out, expert evaluation works, and claims are settled. There must be a very compelling reason to change established business processes.

In the context of high competition in the insurance market and increasing loss ratios in the auto insurance segments and individual property insurance, the digital transformation of processes is becoming not just a trend, but a necessity. The VIEWAPP platform offers automation of a key stage — the inspection of insured objects. To understand whether the investment in such a system is justified, it is necessary to break down the economic effect into its components: direct savings, loss reduction, and operational efficiency.

Upon a detailed analysis of the feasibility of implementing the VIEWAPP service, it becomes obvious: the main economic effect lies in improving data quality and process controllability.

Let's take a detailed look at the total financial effect across the entire cycle.

First — reduction in operational costs for inspections.

Traditional on-site inspections require significant resources: time and money for experts, logistics, coordination, and downtime. The digital format allows transferring a significant part of the inspections to the policyholder and simplifying the work of the inspector. This reduces the cost of a single inspection and allows processing more cases without a proportional increase in staff.

But there is another obvious and equally significant effect — reduction of losses due to unreliable data and fraud.

This is the second, often more significant, source of savings than direct operational savings. The traditional inspection is vulnerable to distortions: substitution of damages, adding old defects to a new claim, and the lack of precise time and coordinate stamps. The insurance company loses money in two ways:

1.  Direct payments for events that did not occur (staged accidents, damage simulation).

2.  Inflated payments due to incorrect documentation of the nature and extent of the damage.

VIEWAPP solves these problems technologically:

  • Automatic recording of time, geolocation, and immutability of media files (protection against editing) makes it impossible to provide "old" photos from a previous accident or insure a non-existent object.
  • A unified shooting standard (VIN number, overall shots, video steps) eliminates situations that previously allowed "adding" to the damage.

How does this affect the economy?

Unlike operational costs, which are easy to calculate directly, the effect of reducing unreliable data and fraud manifests itself at the level of portfolio loss ratio.

First, the share of unjustified payments is reduced.

Even a small reduction in the percentage of fraudulent or disputed cases yields a significant financial result on a portfolio scale. For example, reducing the share of incorrect payments by 1-2% in mass products like car insurance, or individual property insurance leads to savings that are many times greater than the cost of implementing the system. Preventing several "fake" thefts of an SUV, thanks to a verified inspection, can fully recoup the cost of implementing the system, since the cost of such a payout is often comparable to or exceeds the annual cost of digital inspections.

Second, the average payment amount is reduced.

Thanks to more accurate damage documentation, overstatements are excluded: "extra" parts are not added, old defects are not included, and the extent of the damage is determined correctly. This directly affects the average settlement check.

Third, the number of disputed cases is reduced.

When the insurer has a complete and verified picture of the object's condition at the time of inspection, the room for differing interpretations with the client is reduced. This reduces costs for additional expert evaluations, internal approvals, and legal proceedings.

Fourth, the possibility for systematic control and analytics emerges.

The digital inspection format allows for the accumulation of structured data and the identification of recurring anomalies: by type of damage, region, sales channel, or individual agents. This gives the insurer a tool for targeted work on the sources of losses, not just their consequences.

Fifth, the effect scales.

Unlike one-off measures aimed at combating fraud, the digital inspection is embedded into the process and works on every case. This means the economic effect accumulates and strengthens as the volume of inspections grows.

Thus, the impact of VIEWAPP on the insurance company's economy is manifested not only in the prevention of individual fraudulent cases but in a systematic reduction of the loss ratio and an increase in the predictability of the financial result.

In conclusion, the implementation of VIEWAPP is not just about optimizing inspection costs, but a quickly recoverable investment in data quality, upon which the entire insurance model is built. And this is precisely why its economic justification is determined not by savings alone, even if they reach 70% according to our Partners' practice, but by the ability to manage risk at the level of the entire system.